![]() f/22, to obtain the largest depth of field. ![]() One approach that is often taken is to use the smallest aperture available, e.g. This can prove to be challenging and, if not achieved with the click of the shutter, cannot be corrected later during post processing. Usually, it is desirable to ensure that all elements of a scene, whether close or far, are captured in sharp focus. ISO100, f/8, 2 secsĪ key aspect of successful landscape photography is image sharpness. Experiment with both tools to determine which one best suits your creative vision.The initial image, shot at f/8, lacked front-to-back sharpness as there was not sufficient depth of field. Both programs are exceptional in their respective areas and can greatly enhance your images. Remember to consider your workflow and the desired final outcome when making your decision. However, if you require comprehensive image editing capabilities along with focus stacking features, Photoshop is the way to go. If focus stacking is a priority for you, then Helicon Focus is the ideal choice. Photoshop shines in general image editing and manipulation.Ĭhoosing between Helicon Focus and Photoshop ultimately depends on your specific needs as a photographer or artist. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |